And why tracing is a very bad idea
First a practical activity
A black permanent marker pen
Experienced hand writers can write a sentence without needing visual guidance
This is because fluent and efficient handwriting is produced with minimal need for visual feedback.
Letters are formed by a series of strokes
Letters are formed by a series of small movements called strokes.
The pattern of movements (strokes) needed to form a letter are stored in the brain as a motor plan.
The motor plans (also referred to as representations) for each letter contain information about the relative length, direction and sequence of the strokes needed to form the letter.
In fluent handwriting the movements are pre-planned and carried out without the need for visual monitoring or feedback from the muscles. In fact research has shown that after the first few months of handwriting young children not only pre-plan letters, but have started to pre-plan whole syllables.
The equivalence factor: writing big or small uses the same motor plan
Take a sheet of paper and turn it sideways. First sign your name at the top of the paper in your usual size.
Next sign your name so large that it spans the width of the paper. To do this you probably kept your fingers still and moved your hand across the paper using shoulder and elbow movements.
Below there is an example of a signature written both small and large. They look pretty much the same yet the small signature was written using finger muscles and the large one was written using shoulder / elbow movements.
This is because I have used the same, very well learned motor plan to control the actions, but have increased the size of the letters by sending signals to a different sets of muscles.
Learning to print letters is all about learning the motor plan for the letter
Learning to write a letter is a process of learning the relative length, direction and sequence of the strokes that form the letter and storing this information in the brain as a motor plan.e.
How tracing changes movement strategy
Below is an example of a circle drawn freehand
And here is the circle I drew by tracing over the free hand circle. Notice the many changes in direction. Looking at the reverse side of the paper you can see the many stops indicating how I drew the line as a series of segments.
Tracing letters inhibits learning the motor plan
Many handwriting workbooks provide young children with outlines of letters to trace. The outlines often have arrows to indicate the direction of the stroke.
It is important to remember that learning to write letters starts with learning the motor plan for the letters and being able to fluently link the successive strokes to form the letter. Once the child has mastered linking the strokes, the next step is to learn to moderate the movements to produce a letter of particular size. This takes quite bit of practice before a child can plan and control the movement so that the letter fits neatly between predetermined line.
However when a letter is drawn within the confines of an outline, the motor strategy is very different. The child draws a series of short segments and visually monitors the actions to keep between the lines.
Roan (Gr R, second term) has learned the correct stroke patterns for the majority of the letters of the alphabet, but has not yet learned to moderate the size of the letters. It is interesting that she does have quite good spacing between the letters which means that she is able to pre-plan the letter and select the correct start position for each letter.
Here you see my efforts to trace a letter. The lines are not fluent. Because the shape of the letters differs from my usual pattern I need to my movements repeatedly to fit between the lines.
This has two negative consequences. The first is that the child starts to rely on visual monitoring of the writing actions. The other is that the child does not learn the motor patterns for writing the letter.
Children with good graphic skills do not seem to be negatively influenced by tracing practice. They learn the motor plan despite the tracing practice. However for a child with poor graphic skills tracing letters has negative consequences. This is particularly true for children who tend to rely on visual monitoring of their drawing actions.
Below is an example of a worksheet and letter tracing completed by a 6 year old in kindergarten. She in fact has quite fluent letter writing abilities, but this example shows how tracing the letter produces a jagged line as she attempts to conform to the outline of the d.
For an alternative approach to teaching letter formation Teaching handwriting - a stroke based approach
Danna, J., & Velay, J. L. (2017). On the Auditory-Proprioception Substitution Hypothesis: Movement Sonification in Two Deafferented Subjects Learning to Write New Characters. Frontiers in neuroscience, 11, 137. doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00137
Danna, J., Paz-Villagrán, V., Gondre, C., Aramaki, M., Kronland-Martinet, R., Ystad, S., & Velay, J. L. (2015). "Let Me Hear Your Handwriting!" Evaluating the Movement Fluency from Its Sonification. PloS one, 10(6), e0128388. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128388
Gerth, S., Klassert, A., Dolk, T., Fliesser, M., Fischer, M. H., Nottbusch, G., & Festman, J. (2016). Is Handwriting Performance Affected by the Writing Surface? Comparing Preschoolers', Second Graders', and Adults' Writing Performance on a Tablet vs. Paper. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1308. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01308
Julius, M. S., & Adi-Japha, E. (2015). Learning of a simple grapho-motor task by young children and adults: similar acquisition but age-dependent retention. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 225. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00225
Danna J, Velay JL. (2015) Basic and supplementary sensory feedback in handwriting. Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 20;6:169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00169. eCollection 2015. Review. PubMed PMID: 25750633; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4335466. 2:
Danna J, Fontaine M, Paz-Villagrán V, Gondre C, Thoret E, Aramaki M, Kronland-Martinet R, Ystad S, Velay JL. (2014) The effect of real-time auditory feedback on learning new characters. Hum Mov Sci. 2014 Dec 18. pii: S0167-9457(14)00216-4. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.12.002. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 25533208.
Johnson, R. L., Culmer, P. R., Burke, M. R., Mon-Williams, M., & Wilkie, R. M. (2010). Exploring structural learning in handwriting. Experimental Brain Research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation Cerebrale, 207(3-4), 291–295. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2438-5
Overvelde, A., & Hulstijn, W. (2011). Learning new movement patterns : A study on good and poor writers comparing learning conditions emphasizing spatial , timing or abstract characteristics. Human Movement Science, 30(4), 731–744. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2010.08.016
Paz-Villagrán, V., Danna, J., & Velay, J.-L. (2014). Lifts and stops in proficient and dysgraphic handwriting. Human Movement Science, 33, 381–94. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2013.11.005
Vinter, A., & Chartrel, E. (2010). Effects of different types of learning on handwriting movements in young children. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 476–486. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.07.001
Vinter, A., & Perruchet, P. (2002). Implicit motor learning through observational training in adults and children. Memory & Cognition, 30(2), 256–61. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12035887